Back to Articles
On The Alleged Lascivious Nature Of Blues Dancing
There are often discussions (esp. amongst the Lindy Hopper crowd) about the "grinding" and "pelvic thrusting" nature of Blues Dancing. This is a bit surprising to me, in this day and age. Blues Dancing, done with proper athletic posture and connection is less intimate then, say, Tango dancing. The dance in itself is not some lewd excuse for bumping and grinding with potential mates, in fact, if you've ever taken a proper beginning Blues class, you'll discover that this is about as appropriate as it is in the Polka.
I do recognize that there are people who take advantage of the
closeness and often dim lighting to do what effectively amounts
to sexual assault. This should not be somehow confused with
Blues Dancing, if anything, this only makes the assault seem
reasonable by calling it dancing instead of calling it what
it is, assault. I would be quite happy if people treated it
exactly as it is.
But to say that this somehow reflects on Blues Dancing is odd to
me. There are people in every large social group, dancing or not,
who engage in undesirable behaviors. There are people who act
inappropriately who dance Salsa, Tango, Polka and so forth.
Should we sully the names of these dances as well?
Following this reasoning is a
logical fallacy
of a number of forms, the Biased Sample, Misleading Vividness, Spotlight, and
Questionable Cause, and in a sense is an indirect form of the Ad Hominem attack.
What does it mean that it's a logical fallacy? It means that the argument
does not make sense. As compelling as it may be emotionally, it
does not make sense.
Speaking of other dances, I highly recommend reading this article:
David Ljung Madison, June 2009
Back to Articles



