On The Alleged Lascivious Nature Of Blues Dancing
There are often discussions (esp. amongst the Lindy Hopper crowd)
about the "grinding" and "pelvic thrusting" nature of Blues Dancing.
This is a bit surprising to me, in this day and age.
Blues Dancing, done with proper athletic posture and connection
is less intimate then, say, Tango dancing. The dance in itself
is
not some lewd excuse for bumping and grinding with
potential mates, in fact, if you've ever taken a proper beginning
Blues class, you'll discover that this is about as appropriate as
it is in the Polka.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc59b/fc59bcb7d98f19528c75b04573d36514f11668b5" alt=""
I do recognize that there are people who take advantage of the
closeness and often dim lighting to do what effectively amounts
to sexual assault. This should not be somehow confused with
Blues Dancing, if anything, this only makes the assault seem
reasonable by calling it dancing instead of calling it what
it is, assault. I would be quite happy if people treated it
exactly as it is.
But to say that this somehow reflects on Blues Dancing is odd to
me. There are people in every large social group, dancing or not,
who engage in undesirable behaviors. There are people who act
inappropriately who dance Salsa, Tango, Polka and so forth.
Should we sully the names of these dances as well?
Following this reasoning is a
logical fallacy
of a number of forms, the Biased Sample, Misleading Vividness, Spotlight, and
Questionable Cause, and in a sense is an indirect form of the Ad Hominem attack.
What does it mean that it's a logical fallacy? It means that the argument
does not make sense. As compelling as it may be emotionally, it
does not make sense.
Speaking of other dances, I highly recommend reading this article:
Illinois Vigilance Report: Jazz Ruining Girls (1922)
This report is informing us about the dangers of
Lindy Hop.
Yes, Lindy Hop, the happy, bouncy dance of innocents, was once
considered to be corrupting the moral position of the youth of
our country. This was a common stance almost a hundred years ago,
amongst people who didn't know what the Lindy Hop really was.
It turns out the Lindy Hop is just a dance, not the sweet tool
of Satan that many thought it to be.
So consider, if you are making the argument that Blues is a
dance of grinding and sexual promiscuity, then you are to
today as those article writers were to the 1920s. Is that
the company you want to keep?
David Ljung Madison, June 2009